Why copying competitor prices is destroying your margins

Most restaurant pricing decisions are not decisions at all. They’re reactions.

Owners look at nearby menus, delivery platforms, or competitors’ Instagram pages and adjust prices accordingly. The logic feels safe: if others charge this, it must work.

In reality, this habit is one of the fastest ways to destroy margins without realizing it.

Your competitors do not run your restaurant

Two restaurants can sell the same dish at the same price and have completely different outcomes.

Different rent.
Different suppliers.
Different portion sizes.
Different waste levels.
Different staff efficiency.
Different sales mix.

Yet prices are copied as if cost structures were identical.

When you copy a competitor’s price, you are implicitly accepting their economics, not yours. If their costs are lower than yours — and often they are — you’ve just locked in a loss before the first order is even placed.

Competitive pricing hides bad decisions

Pricing based on competition feels rational because it avoids confrontation with reality.

Instead of asking “What does this dish actually earn?”, the focus shifts to “Are we too expensive?”. That question protects volume, not profit.

Margins shrink quietly. Dishes that should be adjusted never are. And when profitability disappears, owners blame marketing, demand, or delivery platforms — not the pricing logic that caused it.

Popular dishes are often the most dangerous

The most copied prices are usually for best sellers.

That’s also where the damage is worst.

A popular dish that is underpriced doesn’t look problematic. It feels successful. But every order repeats the same mistake, and high volume turns small pricing errors into structural losses.

Restaurants don’t fail because one dish loses money once. They fail because one dish loses money hundreds of times per week.

Pricing should start from costs, not fear

Profitable restaurants price from the inside out.

They start with:

• ingredient cost
• realistic portions
• prep and waste
• packaging
• channel-specific fees
• target margin

Only then do competitor prices become relevant — as context, not as rules.

This approach feels uncomfortable because it exposes how many prices were never justified in the first place. But discomfort is cheaper than denial.

Copying prices is easy. Controlling margins is harder.

Copying competitors removes responsibility.
Margin-based pricing forces clarity.

If you don’t know exactly how much money a dish earns after all costs, you’re not pricing — you’re hoping.

And if you want to stop giving money away because someone else seems cheaper, the first step is seeing the real economics of your menu clearly — which is exactly what Kyze helps surface before pricing decisions turn into long-term losses.

‍